Oh, I could go in so many directions with this perspective, but, let’s start where it is front and center with most, sports.
As a Maryland fan, no love lost with seeing a program like Duke being exposed as yet another college shown that winning is more important than protecting the public, and, fuels my theory that one wrong can f– up a lifetime of rights, so , Mr Krzyzewski, welcome to what happened to Joe Paterno.
“Under Pennsylvania law of the time, any state employee who learned about suspected child abuse was required to report the incident to his immediate supervisor. In the case of the 2002 incident, McQueary reported the incident to his immediate supervisor, Paterno. In turn, Paterno reported the incident to his immediate supervisor, Curley, and also reported it to Gary Schultz, who oversaw the campus police at the time. For these reasons, Paterno and McQueary were not implicated in any criminal wrongdoing, since they did what they were legally required to do. However, once the incident came to light, Paterno was criticized for not reporting the incident to police, or at least seeing to it that it was reported. Several advocates for victims of sexual abuse argued that Paterno should have faced charges for not going to the police himself when it was apparent Penn State officials were unwilling to act.“
Antisocial agendas are screwing up so many facets of society, and they count on you, the ignorant, naive, and complicit public to just either look the other way, or buy into the immature and pathetic defenses of denial, projection, deflection, and ugly rationalization at the end. And so many in this country don’t hesitate to participate as asked.
Oh, we could spend days, if not weeks talking about the pervasive antisocial agenda going on in politics, but, I don’t have the time nor strength to note all the disgusting behaviors of your politicians who are out to screw their constituents, and forget Bill C literally screwing them, I am talking about figurative here!
Frankly, let’s end part 1 of this post with Hillary C showing the women out there what women have fought for to gain equality in this country: yes, women can be as big if not bigger scumbags than their male counterparts these days. And, she will be the Democrat nominee for President next year, because I think the Democrats have taken antisocial agenda even lower than their Repugnocant counterparts have in the past 20 years.
Not so sure the best source to illustrate Clinton’s slimy history, but a start:
More to come the next few days, think about coming back during the week?
Part 2, March 8 in the AM (beginning written March 7 in PM):
This part has two sections, first, the growing idiocy leading to antisocial agendas by the youth of this country. First, why are American youth interested in joining ISIS, I mean, if you hate this country so much, then I am glad you are leaving, but to then join an organization or country that wants to destroy your home, wow. Wow, as people like me will support you being taken out, as even if the premise is not flagrant treason, then at least if killing other Americans is one’s life mission, we hope it is short and very painful.
But then this morning I wake up to this story:
“It sounds like Mr. Guevara could have a future career in community organizing or the Democratic party.
“The American flag has been flown in instances of colonialism and imperialism,” he bemoaned. “Flags not only serve as symbols of patriotism or weapons for nationalism, but also construct cultural mythologies and narratives that in turn charge nationalistic sentiments.” “
later was this as a rebuttal:
“Zomorrodian said he wants the American public to know that UC Irvine is a patriotic campus.
“Only six people voted for this,” he said. “We have 22,000 undergrads here. Six people made this decision. The UC Irvine has made huge contributions to bettering this country. This is an elected body that made a decision for the whole and will suffer the consequences of making that decision.”
Mr. Zomorrodian sounds like a very nice young man who understands what the American flag represents — and I hope he musters the votes necessary to rehoist the Stars & Stripes.
As for the handful of un-American rabblerousers who’ve brought shame upon the campus of UC Irvine – I would offer these gentle words:
If you have a problem with the flag and what that flag stands for and the brave men and women who died for that flag – then you are more than welcome to pack your bags and haul your ungrateful buttocks across the border.”
Yeah, but that is how the antisocial agenda gets in, it is a select few who rise to the top of a stew left unstirred, and they prey on those who feel lost or spurned, and then offer ideas that would make anyone with half a brain stop and say “wait a minute, that isn’t making things better!”
This disgust of America by Americans bothers me even more than people wanting to join ISIS, because this is the basic premise to true treasonous thinking and behaviors.
watch this video, just 3 minutes long, but try to listen fully:
When I first heard this, it resonated in me, mostly with the politicians we have in place, both Democrap and Repugnocant, and this line:
“…he [the traitor] rots the soul of a nation…”
and then, “…a murderer is less to fear…”
The traitor is the plague. Here is the full quote, by Cicero, if you don’t want to watch the video, but again, hearing it is powerful to me:
“A nation can survive its fools, and even the ambitious. But it cannot survive treason from within. An enemy at the gates is less formidable, for he is known and carries his banner openly. But the traitor moves amongst those within the gate freely, his sly whispers rustling through all the alleys, heard in the very halls of government itself. For the traitor appears not a traitor; he speaks in accents familiar to his victims, and he wears their face and their arguments, he appeals to the baseness that lies deep in the hearts of all men. He rots the soul of a nation, he works secretly and unknown in the night to undermine the pillars of the city, he infects the body politic so that it can no longer resist. A murderer is less to fear.”
And then to the second part of Part 2 here today, our politicians and their legion that just deteriorates the souls of those who think independently and autonomously. After watching this morning’s Fox News Sunday and listening first to Lanny Davis just pathetically defend Hillary Clinton using her own personal email while Secretary of State
[addendum March 8 PM: thanks to realclearpolitics.com:
, and then following Davis’ pep talk for Hillary, some lackey idiot on the panel
[Neera Tanden, and here it is again per realclearpolitics.com:
starts around 2 minute mark, you have to listen to the sheer bullshit defense by this lackey who then goes on the shameful rant to Will’s comment at the 5:30 mark]
who served on Hillary’s staff while she was Senator, just act incredulous and outraged by other panelists calling out Clinton as doing something outright illegal, well, who the hell are these defenders and apologists, and why do we have to hear them on shows that don’t excuse illegal behaviors!? Hey Clinton shrew, go on MSNBC and spew that crap, and they will cheer you on!!!
This is what the antisocial does so well, and so many either won’t or can’t see the agenda and actions that are at times outright offensive and detrimental to society as a whole. The Democrat side show that followed Benjamin Netanyahu’s speech on Tuesday, deriding him and defending Obama’s agenda to have a pact with Iran, again, wow, if you are jewish and support the Democrats, just slash your own throats now and allow us the ability to focus on those who have a clue!
Yeah, the above comments are harsh and rude, but, so is the antisocial agenda going on in this country in metastatic fashion. Part 3 either tonight or tomorrow, I’ll see what I can endure to write further.
I can’t stand even looking at her anymore of late! So, I hope to share my pain with you all now with the above shot from the Benghazi hearings 2 years ago. Yeah, what difference does that make now, HILLARY!?!?
addendum to here: Oh, this is great!
Lots to read, but this excerpt is perfect:
“There is, of course, a bitter paradox in the fact that Clinton, as a young staffer on the House Judiciary Committee, actually worked on Nixon’s impeachment. Yet to Clinton’s critics, comparisons between the two flow — easily. Rep. Pete Roskam (R-Ill.), a member of the select committee on Benghazi, issued a statement declaring, “The last time we saw a high government official seeking to edit their responses was President Nixon,” adding – with dubious historical accuracy – “and at least then he enjoyed the benefit of executive privilege.”
addendum #2: Ah, the Antisocial in Chief at his usual dishonest, disingenuous self, I mean, come on!
Remember, you surround yourself with like minds, Valerie Jarrett, what is she, the spawn of Satan and this is her pet project, Barry?
“White House spokesman Josh Earnest said Friday that a few officials noticed Clinton wasn’t using a .gov email address. However, he did not say when they noticed and if it raised any red flags. Earnest also brought up the notion that he would not be surprised if Obama learned about it from “newspapers.”
Obama senior adviser Valerie Jarret told Bloomberg News Friday morning she never received an email from Clinton’s private address and did not know if Obama or any other official did either.”
Pay attention to this in the same link: “His [Obama’s] comments came as Politico.com reported that Clinton’s staff made the decision to keep the news of the emails quiet after the White House, State Department and Clinton’s personal office learned in August that House Republicans had been given information showing that Clinton used a private email account to conduct official government business.”
Umm, August was about 8 months ago to this revelation this week. Incredible what we have as leadershit, er, leadership in this country.
Addendum # 3: SNL always for the laugh:
watch the video!!!
Addendum #4: The grand slammer, and baseball season hasn’t even started yet, but, clears the bases for me!
First base: “My more liberal friend says everyone in the Obama administration knows that Iran is a terrorism-exporting regime, that it cheats on nuclear inspections, and that it has called for Israel’s destruction. But he says tougher economic sanctions against Iran or negotiations that humiliate the regime will only cause Iranians to walk away from the talks and build atomic bombs in secrecy. He also believes Netanyahu lacks a plausible plan to thwart Iran’s nuclear ambitions—short of war.
I was inclined until last week to give the White House the benefit of the doubt. That’s no longer true, but not because of anything Netanyahu said last Tuesday. What convinced me to distrust the Obama administration on this question is the Democrats’ own behavior before, during, and after the Israeli prime minister’s speech.
For years, unnamed Obama administration officials have denounced Netanyahu to reporters with a variety of personal insults. The most off-putting were the aspersions passed along to journalist Jeffrey Goldberg that Netanyahu is a political “coward” and a “chicken____.” That’s sketchy on a couple of levels. First of all, Bibi was a captain in the special forces, known for leading commando raids into enemy territory and being shot and wounded in action. And the idea of a Washington political hack who has probably never been in a fistfight, let alone a war, calling him gutless from behind the protective cloak of the anonymous quote exceeds parody.”
Rounding second: “Then there were the five dozen congressional Democrats who boycotted the speech on the grounds that only the president of the United States, and not the House speaker, should invite a foreign leader to speak to Congress. These touchy souls fancied themselves defenders of Barack Obama’s honor. Perhaps they should worry more about the Constitutional doctrine of separation of powers—and the prerogatives of their own branch of government.
The petulance preceding the speech wasn’t a lapse, it was a calculated strategy apparently directed out of the White House. It included Obama’s claim that he wasn’t going to watch Netanyahu— Tuesday at 11 a.m. being such an important hour and all. During the speech, literally, White House aides and Capitol Hill political operatives began circulating the Democrats’ talking points, the main three being: (1) “Nothing new here, folks.” (2) Bibi is offering no specifics. (3) His approach will lead to war.
Coming into third and hard charging: “Pelosi pronounced herself “near tears throughout the prime minister’s speech,” on account of what she termed its condescending tone. She also characterized herself as “saddened by the insult to the intelligence of the United States as part of the P5 + 1 nations.”
That was a reference to five members of the U.N. Security Council and Germany, but Washington jargon wasn’t the only curious aspect of Pelosi’s syntactically tortured reaction. Let’s start with this one: Why demonize the leader of an ally because he has a fundamentally different perception about ongoing negotiations? Netanyahu is obviously sincere, even if he is misguided. Why not have Obama or Kerry answer his objections, or if they don’t want to go that far, just politely ignore his speech? Obama and his loyalists didn’t want him to talk, suggesting they are afraid of his arguments. If they have that little confidence in their own position, why should the rest of us believe it?
Or perhaps they don’t trust the American people to understand it, which would make Nancy Pelosi’s assertion about insulting the nation’s intelligence all the more discordant. One problem is that Democrats in power in Washington these days see everything through a political lens. Netanyahu’s motives? In the Democrats’ telling, he was pandering to his conservative base in Israel’s upcoming elections. In psychology, assigning such motives to other people is called “projecting.”
Nice touch there at the end noting the pathetic immature defense of projection by the characterologically impaired.
And sliding into home when the ball was out of the park in the first place is how the article ends:
“I’d respectfully suggest that many statements have been proffered during the Obama era that an objective observer would characterize as much more insulting to the intelligence of the American voter than anything said by Netanyahu. Many have come from prominent Democrats. Here are seven examples.
— “I don’t think there’s any ill intent in this,” Pelosi’s fellow San Franciscan, California Sen. Dianne Feinstein, told the New York Times in response to revelations about Hillary Clinton’s parallel email system at the State Department.
— “People have different ways of communicating,” added Maryland Sen. Ben Cardin. “I have a granddaughter who does nothing but text.”
— “What matters is that my political opinions have never affected my work.” That’s former IRS official Lois Lerner, claiming her liberal ideological views had nothing to do with her hassling of conservative nonprofit groups.
— “The sequester is not something that I’ve proposed. It is something that Congress has proposed.” That’s Obama, discussing the across-the-board budget cuts first offered by his budget negotiators.
— “If you like your doctor and your health care plan, you can keep it.” That’s also Obama, of course, drumming up support for the Affordable Care Act.
— “This bill was written in a tortured way to make sure [the Congressional Budget Office] did not score the mandate as taxes. … Lack of transparency is a huge political advantage.” So said MIT professor Jonathan Gruber, explaining the administration’s strategy for getting Obamacare through Congress. He continued: “Call it the stupidity of the American voter or whatever, but basically that was really, really critical to getting the thing to pass.”
— “But we have to pass the bill so that you can find out what’s in it.” That’s then-speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi five years ago this month.”
And one wonders why I ask outloud if there is a strong antisocial element in the Democrat party these days. Remember this little point, if the party was so wonderful and had the public’s interests so much more at heart than those bastard Republicans, then, why did the party lose control of the House after just 2 years as a majority party with the White House Democrat controlled as well??
Real bitch to have to think about it, eh, Democrat lackeys!?!?!?!?!
Part 3. and last of this post March 9 in PM:
I was going to write mainly about the flagrant antisocialism of the racist and race baiters after all the BS still going on with what was closed about the Ferguson shooting per Officer Wilson and the findings about the Ferguson police department behaviors in general, and then what I find to be a bit disingenuous by some using the 50 year anniversary of the Selma march to relate it to life now in 2015 America, but, we all know that tune!
Then I was going to again take on the pervasive antisocial behaviors of so many in psychiatry, not just the leadership and KOLs and other influence peddlers, but the grunts in the trenches who have no clue to advocacy and responsible care interventions, but, again, we all know that tune too!
So, as I was driving home tonight, I thought I would share some simple observations to what I see in my daily travels outside the office that is insidious, pervasive, and while petty also equally pathetic and tolerated examples of antisocial acts that just grow in number:
1. The driver who after he/she cuts you off in traffic, gives you the finger and then slows down to either entice you to react, or just be even a bigger prick than the reckless near sideswipe a half mile earlier.
2. The person in the 12 item or less line who has easily 20 items or more when the store is busy, who is incessantly chatting away on the phone having a conversation that would make a manic patient scream in agony, and then when such loser catches your disgusted look of this blatant disrespect for holding up an express line, says in such a cold tone “what the fuck you looking at!?”
3. A patient who just got free health insurance is standing outside the ER waiting room door, smoking a cigarette and asking people walking by for money while a friend is standing next to him talking about scoring some more dope, says in an exasperated tone “Damn lady, let me finish my smoke” when the nurse comes out the door exclaiming “the doctor has been looking for you to finish the exam!”
4. The 10th grade student who is talking on his cell phone in class is just shocked when the teacher comes up and takes it away, telling the kid “you’ll get it back at the end of class”, but, this ‘student’ gets up and grabs the teacher from behind and then cold cocks him in the back of the head, knocking him to the ground and then picks up his phone and walks out of class.
5. Someone as a prank waves an ISIS flag outside a college building and shouts out slogans why ISIS is a reputable organization and should have its rights and freedoms respected, and no one even seems to notice, but when the same guy the next day waves an Israeli flag, numerous students shout out epitaths and even one threatens to shoot him right there.
6. At a birthday party, while the guest of honor is giving a thank you speech, someone in the crowd shouts out “wrap it up” and then throws some food at speaker’s face, and some in the crowd not only laugh, but say under their breath “nice move”.
This is America folks, and if you want more, I give you the three best places to really see what truly are the bowels of society these days:
WalMart, any Post Office line around lunch time, and any Motor Vehicle Administration office for usual vehicle needs like getting a license or renewing your tags. Really, just lean against the wall of any of these places and listen for about 20 minutes, and you’ll see them, the insidious antisocials, who actually might seem just like you, but, hopefully don’t act like you but instead like the people they reelect for public office every 2 years.
We get the electorate we deserve, and as George Carlin so sarcastically said in his political rant from 1996, it’s not the politicians who suck, but, the public. So, if you read the whole post, are you really happy to contemplate we have a growing antisocial element in this society?
And if you are annoyed and angry, why do you put up with the crap that allegedly represents you in your state and federal halls of political offices? Think about it!
And, end of line…